Archive for politics

Victim Disarmament in Action

Fifteen people have been killed and thirty five wounded in two separate shootings just a day apart from each other this week. While the media latches onto stories about the shooters and the victims trying to find a motive in each of the cases one common factor comes to light: all of the victims were unarmed. In all of the mass shootings that have taken place in the past few years, gun control has been the determining factor as to why so many people were killed. Virtually every school, small business and office building have rules in place to stop people from bringing guns to work but the one thing they don’t account for is that criminals don’t follow the rules. Gun control has taken away responsible people’s ability to defend themselves and that has directly lead to the high lethality seen in these mass shootings.

In almost every school or workplace there’s a clause in the contract you sign saying that you can’t possess a firearm on the property making that area a “gun free zone.” Gun free zones are something based on the honor system combined with the intimidation that if you are caught with a firearm, you’re fired or expelled from the school. There are many flaws with this system, the most prevalent being that there usually isn’t the security in place to enforce those rules. The lack of security combined with the hordes of disarmed people makes schools and offices a perfect place for any disgruntled person to walk in and kill as many people as they can.

The media is always quick to demonize guns as the cause of violence and call for new laws to be passed to restrict law abiding citizens right to own firearms after almost every shooting. After the Virginia Tech shooting where a single gunman killed 32 people, in a gun free zone, politicians and the media demanded action. Gun grabbers like the Carolyn McCarthy and the NRA, who has a long history of supporting gun control, teamed up to pass bill requiring background checks into a potential gun buyer’s mental history. On the surface it all sounded logical but upon further inspection it had the effect of banning anyone from owning a firearm based on a diagnosis of almost any mental illness including Post Traumatic Stress Disorder or ADHD which is the something that any child can be diagnosed with.

You would think that with all of these laws and rules in place that businesses and the state would be obligated to protect you but you’d be wrong. The Supreme Court ruled in 2005 that the police don’t have the duty to protect people. Any good police officer will tell you that when something happens, their job is more of cleaning up the mess instead of preventing crime from happening. The average response time by law enforcement to an emergency call is 8 minutes; which is an extremely long time when seconds count. To prove the point even further, you can take a look at the newscasts from the Columbine and Virginia Tech shootings where the police stand outside for hours until the gunmen eventually kill themselves. Still trust the police to protect you?

In England the right to self defense doesn’t exist; a person can not own a gun and will also be arrested for any form of self defense. England also has another startling statistic; it has one of the highest crime rates in any of the developed nations according to a United Nations study. The UK telegraph went so far as to say the UK was the crime capitol of Europe which comes as no surprise since the laws against self defense protect criminals. There are many cases where a home owner is arrested for attacking a burglar or rapist in their home and thrown in jail because they decided to protect themselves and their property. England, as we all know, is where we get a lot of our laws from so it’s not of a far leap to analyze the laws there to predict what will happen in the United States.

Can the solution to most crime be letting people arm and protect themselves? In a single word: yes. Criminals generally aren’t brave and will target the most vulnerable people who can’t defend themselves. Death is a strong deterrent for a criminal and a solution to those disturbed people who don’t fear it. A gunman opened fire at the New Life Church in 2007 but something was different; armed security was there and quickly killed the gunman. The gunman still killed one person and wounded four others but that is a big difference from the 32 people at Virginia Tech. In the wrong hands, which is what the news likes to focus on, guns can be extremely dangerous but all it takes is a gun in the right hands to prevent the carnage that we see on the daily news. The question you need to ask yourself is: am I responsible enough to protect myself and do I want to live in a world where it’s still an option to do so?

Will Environmentalists Save The World

The world is going to end and we’re all going to die. I know, it’s bad news but rest assured it’s true. It’s all downhill from here and there’s no hope unless drastic action is taken. The ice caps are melting, our cities will flood, hurricanes are getting stronger and even the crime rate will rise since we all know criminals are more productive in warm weather. How do I know all of this is happening? I watch the daily news and as we all know, corporate newscasters are the embodiment of integrity and truth. The fact is that even if you believe the whole mantra about global warming movement; all of the solutions that are presented to combat it will only degrade the quality of life for most Americans and increase the overall pollution throughout the world. The price of saving the world will bring the destruction of the environment, businesses and innovation in exchange for the personal gain of a small group of people and businesses.

In a little bit over a month world leaders will meet in Copenhagen to negotiate a new climate change treaty. The treaty will be a game plan for how the nations of the world will combat the warming of the planet by introducing carbon taxes and penalties based on the emissions that the first world nations produce. As we all know, developed industrialized nations produce most of the worlds carbon dioxide which in theory warms the planet and knowing that; the developed nations owe the world compensation for their wasteful ways. The climate change treaty is full of new taxes, money transfers from productive nations to the third world, and tax schemes which will be levied against successful businesses. Not only will industrialized nations pay taxes on what they produce, developing nations such as China and India will be exempt from the new taxes since it will hinder their development.

Under the new proposed rules, American taxpayers will foot the bill for the advancement of the rest of the world by being taxed for almost every action that produces carbon dioxide. Since every part of life, even breathing, produces carbon dioxide, the cost of all of the goods that are produced in America would increase. The new taxes will make American services and goods less completive in the global economy and only hasten the torrent of jobs to overseas nations who are not subject to the same environmental regulations. Since the developing nations will be exempt from strict environmental regulations that first world nations are bound by they will be free to use older, cheaper and dirtier methods for the products they produce.

Al Gore, one of the most influential voices in the global warming debate, teamed up with the former Goldman Sachs executive, David Blood and created Generation Investment Management which deals with investing related to carbon credits. Luckily for Al, he’s able to buy carbon offsets to justify his massive carbon footprint which he produces promoting his message of conservation from his own company. The mainstream media has virtually ignored the money he will be making from the passing of global warming taxes and treaties as well as the conflict of interest that his business brings to the debate.

While the world focuses on global warming (which has conveniently been changed to climate change, since some of the arguments have been debunked) the environmental community has ignored other and more significant issues. For instance take depleted uranium weapons that are being used in Iraq and Afghanistan leaving large cities radioactive leading to increases of birth defects in newly born babies. Other issues that are being completely ignored are the overfishing of the oceans, chemicals from farming pouring into the oceans and creating massive dead zones, the island of plastic between California and Hawaii which is twice the size of Texas, the pollution of 75% of the lakes and rivers in China; the list goes on and on. Of course none of these issues get much press since it would require some action other than shuffling money around.

The world is indeed in an environmental crisis which is something we all need to recognize as we proceed forward into the future. With the right research and initiatives, many of the problems which plague humanity can be solved within our lifetimes. For instance, our space program could be key in solving the world’s energy needs by developing technologies to mine the moon and refine helium 3. With advancements in technology clean, cheap energy could be move from the realm science fiction movies to science fact.

People are starting to wake up to the snake oil sales men who are claiming that they’ll save the world for the charlatans that they are and forcing them to change their rhetoric. Once the politicians and corporate interests that run our government have been exposed, real environmental change can be achieved. As more time passes, rays of hope can be seen forcing themselves through the clouds of political corruption that encompass our society. People are sick and tired of our overbearing government, as polls have shown, and are ready to step away from the era of oppressive leadership so they can embrace the real enlightenment that freedom can bring.

Financial Slavery

When people think of the word slave, for the most part they picture African workers who were imported in order to work on farms during when the United States was first formed. Slavery is generally thought of as something that has occurred in the past when the world was less civilized even though in the modern world, trafficking of children and sex workers has grown to about 800,000 people a year. As horrible as the traditional type of slavery is, it’s nothing when compared with the new age and sophisticated slavery that exists in the modern world. Today, the majority of people in society are considered human capitol whose place is to serve the will of a select few people and multinational corporations which own almost every piece of property and land in the world. They way the new age slave state has been implemented has been through financial control that is designed to deceive people into thinking that they are indeed the owners of their own possessions.

The average American has $8329 worth of credit card debt and people with one credit card or more owe an average of $10679 which adds up to $972.73 billion nationwide according to the Nilson Report. With the declining economy credit card companies are set make more money as people struggle to pay their bills with their regular paychecks and are forced to use their services to survive during the tough economic times. Credit card companies are almost immune to economic downturns and even seem to thrive during those times since their services are used more; not to mention that people who only make the minimum payments increase. Even if you pay your bills on time your rates my still rise and new fees are being imposed in order to make up for some of the more risky loans the companies have made.

People tend to distance themselves from the government often forgetting that the government is a representation of them and in turn forgetting that when the government spends money; they are actually spending the money of common people. Today the national debt is almost $12 trillion which is around $38,750 for each man woman and child in the country. Without any other factors, a child is born owing tens of thousands of dollars to private banks and foreign countries. The only things that are certain in American life are death, debt and taxes.

One form of debt that usually isn’t factored into a person’s financial well being is the mortgage that they owe on their houses. According to the Federal Reserve Americans also owe $14.483 trillion in mortgage debt. While many financial advisors consider mortgage debt a good debt, many families have fallen victim to high rates due to Adjustable Rate Mortgages where payments reflect the state of the current economy. Predatory lending has been common practice in the past few years resulting in millions of people losing their homes and livelihoods.

As the economy failed last year, some of the largest banks who have been directly responsible for home loans and the misrepresentation of their value trough shady business practices have failed. Under the threat of a complete economic collapse congress agreed to bail out the companies that had caused the crisis in the first place. The banks said that if they received a bailout, they could keep loaning money to businesses and home owners to keep the economy afloat. The public was given a number of $700 billion but according to Bloomberg, the American tax payer is now on the hook for $23.7 trillion (which is more money going to private bankers than every home mortgage is worth) in order to save the economy. Even with all of the money that has been loaned to the banks by the taxpayer, so the banks can loan it back to us at a higher rate, the banks have been extremely slow to restore the flow of cash to the people who have given them their money.

The new religion of environmentalism, which does nothing to protect the environment, is quickly becoming one of the forefronts of the financial burdens imposed on the American people. Congress is actively working on a cap and trade system based on companies and a person’s “Carbon Footprint” in order to raise more money for more social programs. Under this program, the taxes, which are based on every aspect of life on the planet, will be paid to international bankers who will then redistribute the wealth to third world countries and multinational corporations.

Aside from upcoming environmental taxes there is another tax which is almost never talked about, the inflation tax. The inflation tax is more of an unofficial tax that occurs when the Federal Reserve prints more money reducing the value of the money that already exists. In the past year the Federal Reserve has printed and poured hundreds of billions if not trillions of dollars into the stock market and international banking institutions to combat the global financial crisis. The money that the Federal Reserve has caused commodities such as gold, to rise as result of the value of the dollar has falling to an all time low.

Those are just a few of the common examples of the debt the American public are entitled to pay. Every day there’s a new debt added to the list. Whether it’s from a personal credit card, government spending, new taxes or even medical bills; almost no one is immune to overspending. The end result is that the human capital is used to pay off large debts while never truly owning the purchases that they have made. The era of cheap credit and money has lead to a way of life where people spend the majority of their lives in order to pay off the debts of not only themselves, but of every person in the country. The entire nation has become a slave of private international banks and multinational corporations who have created the money out of nothing that we are required to pay.

Insane Rednecks or Prophets

After the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995 the mainstream media decided that they would take on the militia movement. The news and government agencies spent countless hours demonizing people who were in militias stating that they were domestic terrorists in an all out propaganda war against the small groups. It didn’t matter that the government’s official story about what exactly happened on April 19th, 1995 was false, even though the original news casts showed evidence that contradicted the official story that there was only 1 truck bomb used in the attack. While I don’t intend to defend the entire militia movement, since there are indeed people and groups who do fit the stereotype of what they are, but what I will like argue is that some of those groups predicted exactly what would be happening in the world today.

When people think about militias in the modern world they like to picture a bunch of fat white men, spewing racist propaganda while they run around in the woods with guns but this viewpoint is extremely flawed. It’s become common knowledge that most of the violent militia groups, animal rights and racist organizations are directly influenced if not run by law enforcement agencies whose job it is destroy legit arguments that these groups may have. In fact the true militias, who aren’t reported on in the news, value education about current political issues, are well spoken and understand that while training to use weapons; violence is a last resort against a tyrannical government.

Considered conspiracy theorists throughout the years, militias predicted years ago that we would be drawn into a one world government, individual rights would be stripped away and the federal government would control every aspect of a person’s life through extensive regulations. Today, as they predicted, the mainstream news is reporting exactly what was once considered a conspiracy theory. The world economy has collapsed by design, the dollar is virtually dead and will no longer be the world currency, behind the scenes a worldwide bank which will control all of the currency in the world is being created; not to mention the massive police state that is slowly building itself up around the country.

The message that the government is out of control is so obvious and widely received by all age groups that earlier this year the government released the “MIAC Strategic Report.” The MIAC Report states that militia members, people who question the federal reserve, people against NAFTA, supporters of political candidates and people who are against global treaties are terrorists. Basically the government is saying that if you dare to question their authority, you’re a criminal.

Were the militias right when they warned America of a one world government and an overbearing police state? Personally I think they were and even if you’re skeptical or don’t agree with my opinion take the time to read your local news or if you’re really lazy, just look up at a busy intersection and see if there are cameras all over your city.

I’m leaving you with a video from 1994 from the Phil Donahue show where he had Militia members on in order to demonize their movement. I’ll leave it to you to judge if they were right.

Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5

Don't Believe the Hype

This week, the first shipments of the swine flu vaccine have been delivered to health care workers across the country. Even before the vaccines arrival, health care workers in New York are pressing legal action because being immunized has been made mandatory for anyone working in the health field in the state. With all the talk of how deadly the “pandemic” will be and how everyone must take the vaccine; it appears that the medical community would be completely insane not to take it. What would make the health care workers resist the vaccine and what do they know about the vaccine that we don’t?

In the 1970s the swine flu surfaced much in the same way that it did today. The government, media, and press made videos about the impending doom that we all faced when confronted with this flu. As time went by, a vaccine was developed which was given to millions of people throughout the country. The vaccine was a disaster and its use was brought to a halt after hundreds of people developed neurological disorders, some resulting in death, from the vaccine. In the end the vaccine caused more damage than the actual flu that the government claimed would end society as we knew it.

Fast forward to what’s happening today; we’re faced with the similar pandemic, the H1N1(Swine Flu for the less politically correct) has come again and is threatening societies very existence. You would think that this would be more dangerous than the normal flu but so far that isn’t the case. Whereas the normal flu kills over 36000 people across the country, the swine flu has only killed around 600 people in the United States so far. Even though we’re 6 months into the end of the world, if you believe your nightly news, society is still functioning as it normally would.

There are many reasons behind why health workers are refusing to take their mandatory vaccinations. One reason is that even the people who do all of the paper work are required to take it, even though they don’t work with patients. Another reason is that they remember what happened the last time a pandemic threatened the country. Some have even come out and pointed out at how little testing had actually been done with the current vaccine. With all of the arguments one thing is certain, a large portion of the workers in the health field are refusing to be immunized.

What effect will the flu vaccine have on the public? The truth is no one knows. If you trust the government, it will save human civilization but if you read the inserts that come with the vaccines, it becomes clear that they haven’t been fully tested. Since the vaccine has only been tested literally for a few weeks and hasn’t been tested on pregnant mothers, women who have recently given birth or on young children it comes as no surprise that people are refusing to take the vaccine, fearful of the side effects.
Here’s a portion of the information that is being included with the vaccine made by Novartis:

5.1 Guillain-Barré Syndrome
If Guillain-Barré syndrome has occurred within 6 weeks of receipt of prior influenza vaccine, the decision to give Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine should be based on careful consideration of the potential benefits and risks.
5.2 Altered Immunocompetence
If Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine is administered to immunocompromised persons, including individuals receiving immunosuppressive therapy, the expected immune response may not be obtained.
5.4 Limitations of Vaccine Effectiveness
Vaccination with Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine may not protect all individuals.
8.1 Pregnancy
Pregnancy Category C: Animal reproduction studies have not been conducted with Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine or FLUVIRIN. It is also not known whether Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine or FLUVIRIN can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman or can affect reproduction capacity. Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine should be given to a pregnant woman only if clearly needed.
8.3 Nursing Mothers
It is not known whether FLUVIRIN or Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine is excreted in human milk. Because many drugs are excreted in human milk, caution should be exercised when Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine is administered to a nursing woman.

8.4 Pediatric Use
Safety and effectiveness in pediatric subjects below the age of 4 years have not been established. [see ADVERSE REACTIONS (6) and CLINICAL STUDIES (14)]

Before you decide whether you and your family are going to take the vaccine it is important to do some basic research into it. If you do decide not to take it remember that schools must have vaccine waiver forms by law and pay close attention to the legal actions being taken by the health care workers, here and in other states for the legal steps you can take, if the vaccine ends up being required in your area.

Call to Service

“Nearly all children nowadays were horrible. What was worst of all was that by means of such organizations as the Spies they were systematically turned into ungovernable little savages, and yet this produced in them no tendency whatever to rebel against the discipline of the Party. On the contrary, they adored the Party and everything connected with it… All their ferocity was turned outwards, against the enemies of the State, against foreigners, traitors, saboteurs, thought-criminals. It was almost normal for people over thirty to be frightened of their own children.” George Orwell 1984

On July 2nd 2008, presidential candidate Obama made a startling statement: “We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.” There’s been debate about the nature of this defense force and what its role in society would be. Even more disturbing has been the advertising related to volunteer work by AmeriCorps, which is geared towards younger Americans. In the past few months, through agreements with the Department of Homeland Security, the Boy and Girl Scouts have been recruited to work with the federal government in security roles answering the question of where some of the Civil Defense Force would be coming from.

After the election it didn’t take long before news articles began to report that the Department of Homeland Security began to train the Boy Scouts to combat terrorists and domestic threats. In an article written in the New York Times titled “Scouts Trained to Fight Terrorists and More,” pictures are shown of Boy Scouts dawning airsoft guns while they train to confront illegal immigrants, drug runners and of course terrorists. A. J. Lowenthal, a sheriff’s deputy in Imperial County California, stated that he would take children as young as 13 and a half into the training program. “I would rather take a kid than possibly lose a kid.” He states in the article. Even parents have a role in the training by donating land for mock raids.

A few months later, September 8th 2009, Janet Napolitano, head of the Department of Homeland Security, and Kathy Cloninger, Girl Scouts of the USA CEO, unveiled a Girl Scout preparedness patch and announced that they would be working together. The exact details of the agreement and the training that would be offered still aren’t clear but one thing is certain, they would be learning to help during flu pandemics, fires, dirty bombs and other natural disasters. While the Girl Scouts don’t say anything about police training; it wouldn’t be a leap, knowing how their counterparts are being used, to see that they’ll also be trained in some aspects of domestic security. See their announcement here.

With the addition of new security systems on a near daily basis and bills designed to give more resources to local police to combat terrorism it comes as no surprise to see cameras at major intersections throughout our local cities. The massive surveillance apparatus that is being put in place will need workers and young children are being groomed for that role every day. Your every move will be watched by the all seeing eyes of children brainwashed to be loyal to the state by the propaganda which is so prevalent on television and schools. It would be intimidating enough if all of this would be used to combat terrorism but with the definition of terrorist being anyone who breaks a law, the system is being turned inward towards the general public itself.

Honor The King

Religion can be traced back thousands of years to the dawn of civilization and has always been a large force driving trends in society. The interpretation of gods will effect not only the moral standards of a society but adversely can be corrupted to expand the controlling governments power and authority over the populace of nations. Whether its Christianity, Muslim, Buddhist, etc there are plenty of examples of how religion has been used to pacify the public as well as inspire them to do things that they know they ought not do. Religion today, especially Christianity has been so corrupted by government influence that it no longer represents the ideals that it was founded upon.

In modern day American almost all churches are run as nonprofit organizations also known as 501C3 organizations, which gives them a tax exempt status but as we all know, nothing comes without a price. Churches which are given this status become increasingly dependent on government because if that status was revoked, it would mean a huge loss in revenue but as long as the church remains under that status, they are not permitted to be involved in politics at all. Taxes are used as means of control and most churches are more than happy to be silent about current issues in exchange for money.

In the past few years, the involvement of government in church activities has taken a frightening new step, churches are now being used to quell decent in their local congregations. In 2007 the mainstream news finally had to admit what had been reported a year earlier in the alternative media; the federal government had indeed created “Clergy Response Teams” to help the government keep control of the population during national emergencies or if martial law is enacted. These teams, made up of local pastors, reinforce that we must serve the government that we have because it is the one that god has given us. The mantra that people accept whatever government does because it is god’s plan has been used more and more in everyday church activities. In effect, modern day religion is being used to pacify the public by either teaching them that they would be defying god’s will to question the government or just telling them to accept that we are now in the end times.

What is the government planning for? Some people say it’s for all out martial law and riots on the street which will come when the economy finally collapses, or a large pandemic; others say it’s just to nullify religions influence over government policy but either way it’s a line that shouldn’t be crossed. History has proven that when government does take control of religion that the results are disastrous, Hitler himself used the same passages in the bible that our government now preaching.

What can you do to prevent government control of religion? The answer to that question is simple, ask your religious figures questions, don’t join churches which are 501C3 organizations and even study your religion yourself. It should be obvious to people; don’t support congregations that are afraid to answer complex or political questions. Religion should be something that expands your outlook instead of hinder you from seeking knowledge.

When Expression Hinders

A year has come and gone since I visited the Folsom Street Fair in San Francisco and here we are again with the fair coming to town tomorrow, complete with all of the free love any gay hippie can dream of. For the people that don’t know what the Folsom Street Fair is let me explain: The fair bills itself as the largest leather event in the world but more than that, it’s also a massive gay orgy. Now gay sex is all well and good but when I was there I couldn’t help thinking about the fight for gay marriage and how this whole event, where if you take a wrong turn you end up in a circle jerk, couldn’t possible help gay people fight for equal rights. The event if anything it makes people less tolerant and supportive of the stereotypes that we all know and love. Personally, since my sense of humor is partly based on stereotypes, I thought the whole event was hilarious but the people who take things more seriously might be horrified with the events that were happening on public streets.

As soon as I walked into the area where the fair was there was a man chained to a fence, a black hood over his head while a smaller man stroked his member and gave his balls a little cup. Of course this was just the beginning of the whole man in leather event. In fact, there were so many nude men, I couldn’t look in any direction without seeing a gay man in leather chaps and a goofy little outfit sure to give any conservative nightmares (I’m sure the poor Hispanic family that happened to take a wrong turn into the fair still has them). In this environment it wasn’t strange to see various men expressing their love for their fellow man and all of his friends as I made my way through the crowd keeping my hands up in above waist level so I didn’t accidently brush them against any of the people expressing their sexuality.

What does all this have to do with gay rights? Well it only takes one person with a camera to spread and demonize the entire gay population. One of the arguments against gay marriage is how immoral the gay population is and this event plays right into the hands of the people expressing that point of view. Once the pictures did make it out, even the more tolerant people would have a problem with outright sex in the streets by the gay men who attend the event. For pictures of what really happens at the fair, just go to this website. I can’t imagine anyone who would argue that this event would help gay, lesbians and transgendered people fight for equal rights.

This fair is just another example of a society which has strived to become so tolerant where people can get away with almost anything that they want to. It shouldn’t be a surprise with events like this that the bill legalizing gay marriage in California proposition 8, much to the dismay of the gay population, was voted down in California in the last election. The fight for civil rights is as much of a public relations fight as it is one for equality and sadly events like this only degrade the publics opinion of the gay population.

Politics Of Tolerance

“I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.”

From a young age, we listen to this speech and learn about tolerance. The words of Martin Luther King Jr. are taught in every elementary school throughout the nation but for some reason, race seems to be a bigger factor in a person’s character than their actual content. Why is there so much emphasis on race and is it directly linked to the tolerance training that we’re indoctrinated with on a daily basis? In fact the propagation of all of those isms that we want to distance ourselves from is directly linked to the increase in sensitivity training and social awareness that floods our schools, media and jobs.

Race has always been used as a tool to divide, even in the early days of or species racism existed amongst tribe of wandering men but in today’s society, the tribalism has returned under the guise of extreme tolerance and a self imposed sense of who someone is. It’s not hard to see, only one has to do is to turn on their television news will surely have a report interviewing a tolerant white man or woman who is claiming other white men who don’t agree with his standpoint hates black men with result being; the offender is labeled a racist for bringing up issues that should be talked about and debated. It’s the man preaching unity and tolerance that brings up race in a petty attempt to remove debate and free expression of another person, as well as spread his own racist views. Take a look at the video below where Jimmy Carter explains that people don’t think our president is qualified because he’s black.

The world today is one where people of all colors and creed feel an entitlement to being a victim when they don’t succeed. How easy is it to blame someone else for your own shortcomings instead of holding yourself to a level which everyone should be at? If a person can’t play the victim and down trodden how can they ask for other people to lift them up from the ashes and to support them? Eliminating one’s own racist ideology would not only remove people’s sense of entitlement and excuse as to why you can’t succeed in the real world but it would force them to take responsibility for themselves. Sensitivity training and tolerant social norms of society only serve to validate their own sense of self inferiority to those who need an excuse why they’re where they are and a reason they’re being held down by another.

What would the world look like without racism? Everyone would be the same and equal. People would be forced to use facts instead of emotion to debate issues, which would be destroy our tolerant based power structure. Instead of talking about getting along people would unite and form communities, which would also be detrimental to the system of governance which we all know and love so.

Would you like to live in a country where everyone had a chance to achieve regardless of the color of their skin, sex or sexual orientation? If you answered yes then it all starts with you. You’re the only one who can hold yourself to a level where you succeed. You’re the only one who can rise above where you’ve come from and become who you want to be. It’s a cold and difficult world out there and it’s up to each person if they’re willing to brave it and remember, no one hates people who succeed more than those who aren’t willing to try it themselves.

  • Tender Sentiments